ArticleJournal of hand and microsurgery2025
Distal ulnar neck fracture displacement with forearm rotation: A biomechanical cadaveric study.
Article in Journal of hand and microsurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Outcomes Following Retrograde Intramedullary Threaded Nail Fixation of Distal Ulnar Neck Fractures.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Management of distal ulnar fractures remains controversial, partly due to its low incidence and operative challenges encountered during surgical fixation. This cadaveric study examined fracture displacement in isolated distal ulnar fractures, specifically AO Muller Q2 and Biyani Type I fracture pattern, during forearm pronosupination.6 fresh frozen cadaveric upper limbs amputated at mid-humerus were used. Soft tissues including proximal and distal radioulnar joints were carefully preserved. Specimens were inspected grossly and radiographically for absence of pathologies. Radiocarpal and midcarpal pinning was performed to facilitate quantification of forearm rotation. 2 markers were each placed proximal and distal to fracture site to quantify fracture displacement. 3-dimensional positional data was recorded using an optoelectronic system (Vicon MX motion capture system).Distance between the 2 markers increased in the proximodistal and radioulnar axis, and decreased in the dorsovolar axis when the forearm was rotated from neutral to 100° pronation. The inverse was observed during supination. Mean aggregate fracture site displacement increased to 9.17 ± 2.78 mm at 100° pronation. Statistically significant increase in aggregate fracture site displacement was observed from 60° pronation onwards. At 100° supination, the aggregate fracture site displacement was 4.58 ± 8.62 mm. When supinating from neutral to 100°, fracture displacement did not increase significantly. Results: from this study suggest that distal ulnar fractures are potentially stable, particularly in supination. However, unrestricted forearm pronation with inadequate immobilisation might still cause further fracture displacement. Further studies are required to assess distal ulnar fracture stability in vivo before treatment guidelines can be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.