ArticleHealth services insights2025
Opening the Door to Wholistic Patient Care: Results from a Nationally Representative Database on the Use of Spiritual and Religious Counseling.
Article in Health services insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Turning toward mortality: yoga'sFrontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The introduction of the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) code Z71.81 in 2015 enabled the systematic documentation of spiritual and religious counseling (SRC) in hospital settings, opening avenues for research into its effect on patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilization. Religion and spirituality are integral to many patients' lives, influencing their well-being, recovery and health outcomes. Despite its potential to improve outcomes, limited data exist on SRC's application and effect in the hospital setting. Objectives: This study evaluated the frequency and characteristics of SRC documentation and explored its associations with patient outcome in the inpatient hospital setting. Design: A retrospective observational study. Methods: Data were drawn from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2021, encompassing all United States hospitalizations excluding military and specialty facilities. This dataset provided a nationally representative sample of all hospitalizations. Inpatient visits coded for SRC were identified using ICD-10 Z71.81. Statistical analyses assessed descriptive trends and associations with outcomes such as mortality, length of stay (LOS), and healthcare charges. Results: The analysis included 5910 SRC-documented inpatient visits from 89 hospitals. SRC was frequently documented for patients with severe or terminal conditions, as evidenced by a significantly higher mortality rate (10.9% vs 2.3% overall). Temporal trends demonstrated a steady, albeit modest, increase in SRC documentation over the study period. While SRC utilization varied across demographic groups, differences in access and outcomes were evident. Conclusion: SRC is primarily utilized in complex, high-mortality cases, underscoring its role in holistic care for severely ill patients. The disparities observed highlight the need for standardized SRC documentation and equitable access to SRC. Future research should investigate the clinical and economic impacts of SRC to enhance patient-centered care in alignment with value-based care practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.