ArticleJournal of neurological surgery reports2025
Article in Journal of neurological surgery reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), despite aggressive multimodal treatment comprising surgery followed by chemoradiation, is almost uniformly associated with inevitable recurrence and poor outcomes. In this clinical context, local radiation therapy-an emerging approach-has gained considerable attention over time for its potential to address the limitations of traditional treatment options for GBM. Multiple surgeries and adjuvant chemoradiation therapy can negatively impact the integrity of the scalp soft tissues and can compromise the ability to achieve primary closure over the surgical site. In these circumstances, complex reconstruction with free tissue transfer may be necessary. Methods: We report the case of a 37-year-old female patient with recurrent GBM and associated wound healing complications who underwent single-stage GammaTile surgically targeted radiation therapy combined with microvascular free flap scalp reconstruction. Results: Immediate free flap reconstruction over the site of GammaTile implantation did not result in any wound healing complications and did not compromise the viability of the transplanted tissue. This approach also provided immediate and localized radiation, possibly enhancing patient progression-free survival while reducing the likelihood of radiation-induced adverse effects. Conclusion: We report the first case of GammaTile implantation with immediate reconstruction of the overlaying soft tissue defect with a free flap. Despite the immediate local radiation produced by the tiles abutting the deep surface of the free flap, there were no complications noted in the vascularity of the transplanted tissue. This finding provides preliminary evidence supporting the safety of using free tissue transfer alongside GammaTile implantation for complex reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.