ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease reports
Sociodemographic and clinical profile from the Brazilian very old 90+ study (BRAVO-90+).
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cognitive impairment and disability are frequent among the oldest-old population, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), where this population is rapidly increasing. However, studies on people aged 90 or older are scarce in these settings. Here we analyze the characteristics of the Brazilian Very Old 90+ (BRAVO 90+) study, a population-based sample of 90+ older adults who died in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Objective: To describe clinical and functional characteristics and investigate factors associated with cognitive impairment in Brazilian adults 90 years or older. Methods: Data were collected at the time of death. Postmortem cognitive evaluation regarding cognitive abilities three months before death was performed using the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale. We investigated factors associated with cognitive impairment selected by a Lasso regression. Results: Among 409 participants (mean age = 94 ± 3 years; 72% women; 69% white; average education = 3.3 ± 3.6 years), hypertension, diabetes, and heart failure were prevalent. Most participants had disabilities. The leading causes of death verified by autopsy were pulmonary edema, pneumonia, and ischemic myocardial disease. Although 48% scored a CDR greater or equal to 1, only 51% had a previous dementia diagnosis. Sedentary behavior, osteoarthritis, and depression were associated with higher odds of cognitive impairment, while married status, greater body mass index, hypertension, and neoplasia were related to lower odds. Conclusions: Cognitive impairment and disability were common among Brazilians aged 90+. The BRAVO 90+ study will provide valuable insights into dementia and resilience in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.