Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40290733›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2025

Two Is Better Than One: Clinical Assessments.

Ahlam A Ayyad, Fahamina Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ahlam A AyyadDivision of Clinical and Administrative Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Xavier University of Louisiana, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1140-8813
Fahamina AhmedDivision of Clinical and Administrative Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Xavier University of Louisiana, New Orleans, LA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing patient clinical assessments has evolved historically. It is an important skillset for all health care professionals to address the most appropriate treatment options for patients while collaborating with the interdisciplinary team. Implementing pharmacy and medical student collaborations can help pave the way in assessing patients in hospital and ambulatory care settings. Medical students' proper diagnosis and pharmacy students' medical recommendations can potentially reduce medical errors. Ultimately, interdisciplinary collaboration enhances clinical assessments, promotes evidence-based medicine, optimizes treatment regimens and monitoring, and improves overall health-related outcomes.

Indexed as

assessingassessmentsclinicalinterprofessional collaborationpatient care

Identifiers

PMID40290733
PMCPMC12033629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.