Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40290731›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2025

General Hospitals with High-Tech Medical Equipment and Patient Experience.

Se Min Oh, Jun Su Park, Bomgyeol Kim, Suk-Yong Jang, Sang Gyu Lee, Tae Hyun Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Se Min OhPurchasing Management, The Catholic University of Seoul ST. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jun Su ParkDepartment of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9699-2938
Bomgyeol KimMo-im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Nursing, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Suk-Yong JangGraduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang Gyu LeeDepartment of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tae Hyun KimGraduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between the retention of high-tech medical equipment in medical institutions in South Korea and patient experience evaluation outcomes. Data were sourced from the third Patient Experience Assessment conducted by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA), a South Korean agency, and HIRA's 2021 data on medical equipment. A total of 320 institutions equipped with CT, MRI, and PET scans or only CT and MRI were analyzed. The dependent variable was the average score across six patient experience dimensions: overall, nurses, doctors, medication and treatment, hospital environment, and guarantee of patient rights. Multiple regression analysis revealed that institutions with CT, MRI, and PET scans scored higher in-patient experience, particularly in the overall dimension (2.15 points), hospital environment (2.22 points), patient rights (1.77 points), and doctors (1.54 points). These findings suggest that high-tech medical equipment positively influences patient satisfaction with care quality. Medical institutions should consider these factors when aiming to enhance patient experience.

Indexed as

high-tech imaging technologyhigh-tech medical equipmenthospital environmentmedical institutionpatient experience

Identifiers

PMID40290731
PMCPMC12033505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.