ArticleKardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery2025
The diagnostic value of thoracic ultrasound in thoracic surgery consultations: a new tool in pleural effusion decision-making.
Article in Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comments on "The diagnostic value of thoracic ultrasound in thoracic surgery consultations: a new tool in pleural effusion decision-making".Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Thoracic ultrasound (US) is a practical tool in radiology that has been commonly used for decades. Its daily clinic use in thoracic surgery is rising, and scientific evidence is needed to support its use. Aim: We aimed to determine the diagnostic value of handheld, portable thoracic ultrasound scanning (HH-US) in patients referred to the thoracic surgery outpatient clinic with suspected pleural effusion and compare the diagnostic role with chest X-rays (CXR) or computed tomography (CT). Material and methods: We analyzed the patients between 2020 and 2023 who were referred to our outpatient clinic with various symptoms and having differential diagnosis of pleural effusion. In total, 91 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Ultrasonographic (US) scans were performed by thoracic surgeons who were educated and certified in ultrasonography training. All patients underwent US first and then were referred for chest X-ray or computed tomography. All the results were compared focusing on the efficacy of US initially. If the amount of the effusion required drainage, thoracentesis was carried out with US support. The indications, methods, time, and related complications, with demographic data of the patients were recorded and analyzed. Results: There were 57 (62.6%) male and 34 female (37.4%) patients. Only diagnostic thoracentesis was performed in 16 patients, catheter thoracostomy was performed in 47 patients, minimal effusion not requiring pleural intervention was observed in 6 patients (2 patients were trauma patients who applied to the emergency department), minimal effusion was detected in 14 patients, and no intervention was performed. No complications were observed. The sensitivity of US in detecting fluid effusion compared to CXR was 83.3%, while its sensitivity compared to thorax computed tomography (CT) was 88.5%. Conclusions: Proficient thoracic surgeons can effectively employ ultrasound devices for diagnosing and managing pleural effusions. This would be helpful for decision making and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.