Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40290632›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors reports2025

E-cigarette and cannabis use among current and recently quit smokers: Co-use and Co-cessation.

Deanna M Halliday, Anna V Song, Nhung Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Deanna M HallidayCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States.
Anna V SongDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of California, Merced, California, United States.
Nhung NguyenCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Concurrent use of cigarettes with e-cigarette or cannabis (co-use) is common. It is unclear whether people who want to quit smoking cigarettes would also be interested in quitting using e-cigarettes/cannabis (co-cessation). Methods: In a survey of 391 Californian adults, participants reported past 30-day use of and intentions to quit cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and cannabis, and reasons for using e-cigarettes and/or cannabis. Using cross-tabulation tables, we examined the relationship between cigarette, e-cigarette, and cannabis cessation intentions. We subsequently examined how the reasons for using e-cigarettes and cannabis related to e-cigarette and cannabis use frequency, while controlling for cigarette use and demographic characteristics. Results: Of those who used both cigarettes and e-cigarettes and planned to quit smoking within the next 30 days, 68.9 % also planned to quit using e-cigarettes. Of those who used both cigarettes and cannabis and intended to quit smoking within 30 days, 30.0 % also wanted to quit using cannabis within the same period. Using e-cigarettes or cannabis to aid with cigarette cessation had no impact on e-cigarette or cannabis use frequency. Significance: Those who intended to quit smoking cigarettes within 30-days also expressed interest in quitting e-cigarettes or cannabis within the same period. Using e-cigarettes or cannabis to quit smoking was not related to higher frequency e-cigarette or cannabis use. Future interventions may promote co-cessation of cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and cannabis simultaneously.

Indexed as

CannabisCigarettesCo-UseE-cigarettesTobacco

Identifiers

PMID40290632
PMCPMC12033952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.