Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40290603›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of orthopedics2025

Sixteen patients regarding the conservative treatment for hook of hamate fracture.

Toshikazu Tanaka, Yuichi Yoshii

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of orthopedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Toshikazu TanakaDepartment of Orthopedics Surgery, Kashiwa Hand Clinic, Kashiwa 2770005, Chiba, Japan. tanaka1041@msn.com.
Yuichi YoshiiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center, Ami 3000332, Ibaraki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHook of hamate fractures occur either due to repetitive stress from gripping sports (

aimTo present a case series of 16 patients conservatively treated for hook of hamate fractures.

methodsThis study included 16 (11 males and 5 females; right side, 6 cases; left side, 10) patients who desired conservative treatment and could be followed-up until bone union was achieved. The average age of the patients was 49.6 (range: 24-72) years. The average time from injury to consultation was 4.3 (range: 0.2-21.4) weeks. The treatment involved 4 weeks of casting from the forearm to the metacarpophalangeal joint, followed by 8 weeks of splint fixation of the wrist. Follow-up computed tomography scans were performed every 4 weeks.

resultsBone union was achieved in all patients. The average duration of casting was 3.7 (range: 0-5) weeks and that of splint fixation thereafter was 8.6 (range: 0-28) weeks. The patients did not exhibit joint contractures or range of motion restrictions due to prolonged immobilization.

conclusionConservative treatment with external fixation may be an option for hook of hamate fractures.

Indexed as

Conservative treatmentFractureHook of hamateImmobilizationTreatment

Identifiers

PMID40290603
PMCPMC12019143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.