ArticleWorld journal of orthopedics2025
Validity of the Arabic version of AAOS-foot and ankle outcomes questionnaire in patients with traumatic foot and ankle injuries.
Article in World journal of orthopedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing global orthopedic research through culturally adapted outcome measures.World journal of orthopedics · 2025Article
- Linguistic exclusion in orthopedic research: Cultural adaptation, multilingual innovations, and pathways to global health equity.World journal of orthopedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArabic-speaking patients are underrepresented in orthopedic clinical studies, particularly in foot and ankle trauma research. The lack of validated Arabic language tools hinders their inclusion, creating a need for culturally and linguistically adapted instruments. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Outcomes Questionnaire (AAOS-FAOQ) is a widely used tool but has not been adapted for Arabic-speaking patients.
aimTo translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate the AAOS-FAOQ for Arabic-speaking patients with traumatic foot and ankle injuries.
methodsThe cross-cultural adaptation followed established guidelines, involving forward and backward translations, expert review, and pre-testing. The final Arabic version was administered alongside the Arabic Short-Form 36 (SF-36) to 100 patients for validity testing. Reliability was assessed through test-retest methods with 20 patients completing the questionnaire twice within 48 hours. Pearson correlation coefficients measured convergent and divergent validity with SF-36 subscales, while Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) determined internal consistency and reliability.
resultsOut of 100 patients, 92 completed the first set of questionnaires. The Arabic AAOS-FAOQ showed strong correlations with the SF-36 subscales, particularly in physical function and bodily pain (
conclusionThe Arabic version of the AAOS-FAOQ demonstrated validity and reliability for use in Arabic-speaking patients with traumatic foot and ankle injuries. This adaptation will enhance the inclusion of this population in orthopedic clinical studies, improving the generalizability of research findings and patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.