Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40290576›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbes2025

Psychrotrophic Antarctic marine bacteria as potential reservoirs for novel antimicrobial genes.

Kudzai Hwengwere, Grant G January, Kerry L Howell, Lloyd S Peck, Mathew Upton, Melody S Clark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kudzai HwengwereBritish Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge CB3 0ET, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5979-5416
Grant G JanuarySchool of Biomedical Sciences, Derriford Research Facility, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, PL6 8BU, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6569-7596
Kerry L HowellSchool of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3359-1778
Lloyd S PeckBritish Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge CB3 0ET, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3479-6791
Mathew UptonSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Derriford Research Facility, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, PL6 8BU, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4287-6396
Melody S ClarkBritish Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge CB3 0ET, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3442-3824

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antarctica is a very cold, isolated continent surrounded by frozen seas, yet these extreme environmental conditions have not restricted life and diversity in the sea. The marine environment is seasonally highly productive and harbours diverse and abundant communities of organisms, with many endemic species occurring nowhere else in the world. Such communities and their associated microbiomes are increasingly recognized as an unexplored source of novel antimicrobial products. Hence, the major aim of this study was to examine the antimicrobial potential of bacteria cultured from eight Antarctic marine invertebrate species, while gathering data on Antarctic microbial thermal and salinity tolerances. All cultured bacterial species (

Indexed as

biosynthetic gene clusterinvertebratemicrobialOSMACsalinitythermal tolerance

Identifiers

PMID40290576
PMCPMC12032627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.