Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40290570›Full record

ReviewMacromolecules2025

Strategies to Improve the Sustainability of Silicone Polymers.

Michael A Brook, Yang Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Macromolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael A BrookDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, McMaster 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4M1.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0705-9657
Yang ChenDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, McMaster 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4M1.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6546-1137

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Silicones underpin an enormous range of simple and advanced technologies. Often, only small quantities of silicone are used to enable a technology such that, on a "per use" basis, one might suppose the environmental impact is low. However, silicone preparation processes have a very high carbon footprint, and billions of kg are produced each year. To provide context to the consideration of new strategies to improve silicone sustainability, we first outline traditional silicone chemistry and then describe strategies to improve the degree to which silicones are green, sustainable and circular. One strategy involves dilution of the silicone oil or elastomer by tethering organic entities, particularly natural products, that may provide new properties including facilitated degradation in nature at end-of-life. A greater focus is given to strategies that permit extensive reuse and repurposing of oils and elastomers (e.g., with thermoplastic elastomers), before the silicone undergoes recycling. Each reuse, repurposing or recycling step reduces the net carbon footprint. These mostly involve straightforward, high-yielding organic chemical processes that work efficiently in a silicone milieu. Silicones will eventually end up in the environment, where linear oils are known to rapidly degrade, particularly when compared to organic polymers. Alternative strategies that permit triggered or biological degradation of oils and, more importantly elastomers, are described, including enzymatic degradation and composting.

Identifiers

PMID40290570
PMCPMC12020741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.