ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
Functional MR elastography measures visual cortex stiffening proportional to visual contrast intensity in regions of activation.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synaptic micromechanics and brain softening as a mechanobiological hypothesis for Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Perfusion-mechanics coupling of the hippocampus.Interface focus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional MRI (fMRI) is widely used to spatially localize neural activity in the brain associated with functional stimuli. Functional MR Elastography (fMRE) has recently been introduced as a complementary approach that measures the mechanical response to functional stimulus. The hypothesis of the current study is that the stiffness change in fMRE is proportional to the underlying neural activity. This hypothesis is tested by measuring the median stiffness change in the visual cortex as a function of luminance-matched contrast intensity of a checkerboard visual stimulus in 16 healthy subjects. The fMRE signal in the visual cortex was observed to be proportional to the contrast intensity of the visual stimulus. In regions of activation, fMRE signal increased in the range of 2 ± 1% to 5.8 ± 1% and fMRI signal increased by the expected 0.4 ± 0.2% to 0.9 ± 0.2%, for contrast levels of 5% to 100%, respectively. In conclusion, this study shows that the fMRE signal in the visual cortex can be directly modulated by the contrast intensity of a visual stimulus. The presence of some overlap between fMRI and fMRE regions of activation may suggest two distinct mechanisms governing the fMRI and fMRE signals, which will be investigated in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.