ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Developmental trajectories of and reciprocal relationships between Chinese university students' foreign language reading self-efficacy and reading strategy use.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite extensive research recognizing the critical role of foreign language reading self-efficacy and reading strategy use in L2 learning, longitudinal studies examining the relationships between these two variables from a dynamic developmental perspective remain scarce. This study investigated the developmental trajectories and reciprocal predictive relationships between foreign language reading self-efficacy and reading strategy use within the context of English as a foreign language (EFL) education in China. Data were collected from 293 Chinese undergraduate EFL students at five time points over the course of one academic year using a mixed-methods approach which included parallel latent growth models, cross-lagged analyses, and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative analyses indicated that the participants' foreign language reading self-efficacy firstly increased, followed by a decline, and then rose again, with significant individual variations in both initial levels and rates of change. The initial levels did not affect the rates of increase. Meanwhile, the participants' use of foreign language reading strategies showed a significant increase over time. The initial levels of reading strategy use did not influence its rates of change, with only the former exhibiting significant individual differences. Moreover, positive correlations were found between the initial levels of reading self-efficacy and reading strategy use, as well as between their growth patterns. Additionally, a bidirectional predictive relationship was identified between foreign language reading self-efficacy and reading strategy use, with the influence of reading strategy use on self-efficacy being stronger than the reverse. Qualitative results provided further insights into the participants' changes in their reading self-efficacy and the underlying factors driving these changes. The findings hold practical implications for EFL educators, highlighting the necessity of incorporating self-efficacy-enhancing instruction and reading strategy training in their reading classes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.