ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Exploring the determinants on continuance participation of college students toward blended learning: the stimulating role of course characteristics and instructor support.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rumination and Nomophobia Among University Students in Jilin Province: Indirect and Moderating Associations.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Blended learning (BL) has become an important learning method in the high education with the rapid advancement of "Internet + Education," however, college students face notable challenges, such as high dropout rates, low participation and low persistence, which largely reduce the learning effect of BL. Therefore, it is necessary to deeply analyze the question: "What factors will influence college students' continuance behavior in blended learning (CBBL)?" Methods: Based on the stimulus-organism-response (SOR) framework and social cognitive theory, this study constructs an integrated model of " Results: The empirical results indicating that, (1) this integrated model explains 62.85% of the variance in college students' CBBL, and LM, SEF, and LET emerge as the key determinants influencing college students' CBBL. (2) BCC positively affects LM and LET but has no significant on SEF, and it promotes college students' CBBL through LM and LET rather than SEF. (3) ITS exerts a significant influence on LM, SEF, and LET, with the most pronounced impact on LET. Moreover, ITS significantly facilitates college students' CBBL via LM, SEF, and LET. Originality/value: This study theoretically contributes to literature on BL and extends the application scope of SOR framework. Also, it reveals the antecedents of college students' CBBL in the BL environment, which is crucial for guiding their continuance learning and promoting the sustainable development of BL education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.