Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40290540›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

A causal model of leader ethical behavior and radical innovation: the mediating effect of leader identification and the moderating effect of promotion focus.

Lingfeng Zhu, Le Wang, Xiu Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lingfeng ZhuDepartment of Business Administration, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Le WangDepartment of Business Administration, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Xiu JinDepartment of Business Administration, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Innovation is essential for an organization's survival and growth, with radical innovation driving transformative change. Despite its significance, the mechanisms that foster employees' radical innovation remain underexplored. This study examines how leader ethical behavior influences radical innovation, offering a novel perspective on leadership's role in fostering innovation. Methods: A quantitative approach was employed, utilizing survey data from 371 employees of Chinese small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Structural equation modeling (SEM) was applied to test the research model, which links leader ethical behavior to radical innovation, emphasizing the mediating role of leader identification and the moderating role of promotion focus. Results: The findings reveal that leader ethical behavior positively influences both leader identification and radical innovation. Furthermore, leader identification mediates the relationship between leader ethical behavior and radical innovation. Promotion focus strengthens the effects of leader ethical behavior on radical innovation, as well as the impact of leader identification on radical innovation. Discussion: This study contributes to radical innovation research by integrating leader ethical behavior into the innovation discourse, extending theoretical perspectives beyond conventional drivers. The findings provide practical insights for organizations seeking to cultivate innovative work environments, enhance leader identification, and empower employees for radical innovation.

Indexed as

leader ethical behaviorleader identificationpromotion focusradical innovationrelational identification theorysocial exchange theory

Identifiers

PMID40290540
PMCPMC12021847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.