ArticleClinical and experimental hepatology2024
Deep learning-based classification of gallbladder lesions in patients with non-diagnostic (GB-RADS 0) ultrasound.
Article in Clinical and experimental hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim of the study: Non-diagnostic ultrasound (US) of the gallbladder may be due to various factors. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of deep learning-based classification of gallbladder lesions on US images in patients with non-diagnostic US secondary to gallbladder factors. Material and methods: Consecutive patients with non-diagnostic US due to calculi within the gallbladder lumen, obscuring the detailed evaluation, were identified by a research fellow from a prospective database of patients with gallbladder lesions. The US reports and images were evaluated by a radiologist blinded to the final diagnosis. Patients who had the final pathological diagnosis based on fine-needle aspiration cytology, percutaneous or endoscopic biopsy, or surgical histopathology were included. Convolution neural networks (ResNet50, GBCNet), transformer models (vision transformer [ViT], RadFormer), and a hybrid model (MedViT) were trained on a public gallbladder dataset (GBCU dataset). The performance of these models for classifying gallbladder lesions into benign and malignant was tested on non-diagnostic (GB-RADS 0) US images. Results: Training and validation cohorts (GBCU dataset) comprised 1004 and 251 images, respectively. The testing data (26 patients, mean age [SD]: 57.5 ±8.07 years, 17 female) comprised 304 images. The best performance for detection of GBC was achieved with GBCNet (sensitivity 51.1%, specificity 83.3%, area under the curve [AUC] 0.709) and MedViT (sensitivity 92.8%, specificity 50%, AUC 0.714). MedViT had the best accuracy (73.1%) for detecting benign gallbladder lesions. Conclusions: These results suggest that deep learning models can potentially stratify patients with non-diagnostic US. However, further improvement in the performance is needed to render this approach relevant in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.