ReviewTherapeutic advances in drug safety2025
Mydriasis mediated by local anesthetics: an unexpected adverse event or new therapeutic indication?
Review in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing off-label use of medications needs a robust pharmacovigilance system. This is particularly crucial given the abundance of scientific data that can be harnessed to ensure a product's safety. Our review focuses on the off-label use of local anesthetics, a common practice in topical and intracameral applications. However, the occurrence of mydriasis, as indicated in the monographs/summaries of product characteristics, is an unexpected adverse event. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive understanding of mydriasis caused by local anesthetics, both as an unexpected adverse event and as an off-label use, to reinforce the importance of pharmacovigilance practices. We conducted a comprehensive search in Medline/PubMed and Google Scholar from two distinct perspectives: examining the occurrence of mydriasis with the use of local anesthetic as an adverse event and as an off-label use. Our search yielded 14 articles that reported mydriasis as an unexpected adverse event with the use of anesthetics, with dental procedures being a significant contributor to this type of event. Also, we identified eight articles that explored the off-label use of local anesthetics to induce mydriasis, with the most common method of drug administration being intracameral injection. These findings underscore the importance of our research in understanding the unexpected adverse event of mydriasis and the potential for off-label use of local anesthetics. They also highlight the need for continued involvement and vigilance in this area, as our understanding of these phenomena continues to evolve and further investigation is crucial. The use of local anesthetics for mydriasis holds significant promise, particularly in ophthalmological surgeries. This approach could potentially mitigate the adverse events associated with conventional mydriatics, offering a more efficient and safer alternative. Furthermore, using a single medication for akinesia, anesthesia, and mydriasis could significantly enhance the efficiency and convenience of surgical procedures. On the other hand, it is crucial to extend the knowledge of the mydriasis-anesthesia association through risk minimization activities (e.g., the inclusion of monographs/summary of product characteristics) to communicate the risk of mydriasis with the use of local anesthetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.