Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40290447›Full record

ArticleAdvanced modeling and simulation in engineering sciences2025

Response estimation and system identification of dynamical systems via physics-informed neural networks.

Marcus Haywood-Alexander, Giacomo Arcieri, Antonios Kamariotis, Eleni Chatzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced modeling and simulation in engineering sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marcus Haywood-AlexanderDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zürich, Wolfgang-Pauli Strasse, 8049 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3384-2346
Giacomo ArcieriDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zürich, Wolfgang-Pauli Strasse, 8049 Zürich, Switzerland.
Antonios KamariotisDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zürich, Wolfgang-Pauli Strasse, 8049 Zürich, Switzerland.
Eleni ChatziDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zürich, Wolfgang-Pauli Strasse, 8049 Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate modelling of structural dynamics is crucial across numerous engineering applications, such as Structural Health Monitoring (SHM), structural design optimisation, and vibration control. Often, these models originate from physics-based principles and can be derived from corresponding governing equations, often of differential equation form. However, complex system characteristics, such as nonlinearities and energy dissipation mechanisms, often imply that such models are approximative and often imprecise. This challenge is further compounded in SHM, where sensor data is often sparse, making it difficult to fully observe the system's states. Or in an additional context, in inverse modelling from noisy full-field data, modelling assumptions are compounded in to the observation uncertainty approximation. To address these issues, this paper explores the use of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), a class of physics-enhanced machine learning (PEML) techniques, for the identification and estimation of dynamical systems. PINNs offer a unique advantage by embedding known physical laws directly into the neural network's loss function, allowing for simple embedding of complex phenomena, even in the presence of uncertainties. This study specifically investigates three key applications of PINNs: state estimation in systems with sparse sensing, joint state-parameter estimation, when both system response and parameters are unknown, and parameter estimation from full-field observation, within a Bayesian framework to quantify uncertainties. The results demonstrate that PINNs deliver an efficient tool across all aforementioned tasks, even in the presence of modelling errors. However, these errors tend to have a more significant impact on parameter estimation, as the optimization process must reconcile discrepancies between the prescribed model and the true system behavior. Despite these challenges, PINNs show promise in dynamical system modeling, offering a robust approach to handling model uncertainties.

Indexed as

Machine learningPhysics-enhancedState estimationStructural health monitoringSystem identification

Identifiers

PMID40290447
PMCPMC12018630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.