ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Bioinformatic challenges for pharmacogenomic study: tools for genomic data analysis.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the Very Important Pharmacogenes (VIPs): Uncovering Shadow Pharmacogenes in the Human Drug Response Network.ACS omega · 2026Article
- PathoAnalyzer-I: An Integrative Bioinformatics Platform for Chronic Disease Analysis.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2026Article
- Current Bioinformatics Tools in Precision Oncology.MedComm · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sequencing of the human genome in 2003 marked a transformative shift from a one-size-fits-all approach to personalized medicine, emphasizing patient-specific molecular and physiological characteristics. Advances in sequencing technologies, from Sanger methods to Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), have generated vast genomic datasets, enabling the development of tailored therapeutic strategies. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) has played a pivotal role in elucidating how the genetic make-up influences inter-individual variability in drug efficacy and toxicity discovering predictive and prognostic biomarkers. However, challenges persist in interpreting polymorphic variants and translating findings into clinical practice. Multi-omics data integration and bioinformatics tools are essential for addressing these complexities, uncovering novel molecular insights, and advancing precision medicine. In this review, starting from our experience in PGx studies performed by DMET microarray platform, we propose a guideline combining machine learning, statistical, and network-based approaches to simplify and better understand complex DMET PGx data analysis which can be adapted for broader PGx applications, fostering accessibility to high-performance bioinformatics, also for non-specialists. Moreover, we describe an example of how bioinformatic tools can be used for a comprehensive integrative analysis which could allow the translation of genetic insights into personalized therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.