Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40290396›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Activity May Not Reflect the Numbers: An Assessment of Capture Rate and Population Density of Dingoes (

Moses I Omogbeme, Malcolm S Kennedy, Tracey L Kreplins, Halina T Kobryn, Patricia A Fleming

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Moses I OmogbemeCentre for Terrestrial Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Harry Butler Institute Murdoch University Murdoch Western Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7178-8809
Malcolm S KennedyDepartment of Primary Industries and Regional Development Perth Western Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4204-7080
Tracey L KreplinsDepartment of Primary Industries and Regional Development Northam Western Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6439-7858
Halina T KobrynSchool of Environmental and Conservation Sciences Murdoch University Murdoch Western Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1004-7593
Patricia A FlemingCentre for Terrestrial Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Harry Butler Institute Murdoch University Murdoch Western Australia Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0626-3851

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most human-carnivore conflicts arise from the impact of predation on livestock. In Australian rangelands, considerable resources are allocated to constructing exclusion fences and implementing control measures to manage dingo populations for sustainable livestock enterprise. Assessing the effectiveness of these measures is crucial for justifying the investment. We used a replicated experimental design to examine the effect of landscape-scale dingo-proof exclusion fences ('cell-fencing') on activity and population density of dingoes in the Southern Rangelands of Western Australia. We monitored dingo populations for 22-24 months across six study sites nested within a landscape of about 75,000 km

Indexed as

exclusion fencelivestockpopulation densitypredator controlspatially explicit capture–recapturewild dog

Identifiers

PMID40290396
PMCPMC12034454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.