ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Standardization of a High-Quality Methodological Framework for Long-Term Genetic Monitoring of the French Wolf Population.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the gray wolf was eradicated from large parts of Europe, this species has been recolonizing much of its former distribution, particularly since the past 30 years. Wolves benefit from European legal protection through the Habitats Directive and the Bern Convention, and reporting on the evolution of their populations in each country of Europe is mandatory. To monitor French wolf populations over the long term, a standardized high-quality methodological framework has been developed to analyze data from noninvasively collected samples and assess population diversity. We delineated each step and implemented a laboratory control procedure to analyze 8733 samples harvested within the French distribution range of the species between 2006 and 2022, and provided key quality and diversity indicators. Of these samples, 82.8% were successfully amplified and sequenced for the mitochondrial control region. Subsequently, the wolf samples were genotyped at 22 microsatellite autosomal loci and a sex locus displayed over two independent multiplexes using the multitube approach. The average success rate of polymerase chain reaction per locus was 64.2% across all replicates. The residual genotyping error rates were low compared to those in other studies using non-invasively collected samples, with mean residual allelic dropout rates of 5.8% per locus and mean residual false allele rates of 1.0% per locus. The high-quality dataset identified 1735 individuals in total over the last 15 years, of which 99.9% exhibited a single Italo-Alpine mitotype. Genetic diversity was relatively low, with mean observed heterozygosity of 0.482 and mean expected heterozygosity of 0.519. This supports the natural colonization of the French Alps by a few individuals originating from the remaining Italian populations, which started approximately 30 years ago. By generating high-quality standards and quality control processes, this protocol enhances the cost-efficiency ratio of monitoring French wolf populations and holds high value for managers tasked with the management and conservation of wolf populations in the long term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.