ArticleJournal of emergencies, trauma, and shock
Take Two: Second Systolic Blood Pressure Provides Prognostic Information in Trauma.
Article in Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictors of 30-Day Mortality in Trauma: A Single-Center Retrospective Exploratory Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: An initial systolic blood pressure (SBP1) of <110 mmHg has been shown to predict mortality. However, SBP1 may not reflect hemodynamic changes during initial resuscitation. We aimed to determine if the second recorded blood pressure (SBP2) could provide additional prognostic value. Methods: An 8-year retrospective chart review was performed including patients who underwent trauma activations at a single institution. The initial systolic blood pressure (SBP 1) and second systolic blood pressure (SBP 2) were analyzed. Difference between the first and second systolic blood pressure (ΔSBP) was defined as SBP2 - SBP1. The primary outcome was inhospital mortality, and the secondary outcome was receipt of ≥2 units of blood in the first 4 h of admission. Univariable analysis and logistic regression analysis were performed to assess the relationship of SBP2 and ΔSBP with the study outcomes. Regression model fit was assessed by the likelihood ratio test and Akaike information criterion. Results: Eight thousand seven hundred and ninety-eight patients were included with 12% and 13% presenting with SBP1 <110 mmHg and SBP2 <110 mmHg, respectively. Four hundred and six (5%) died and 327 (4%) received ≥2 units of blood in the first 4 h. The addition of ΔSBP to regression models improved model fit in explaining the primary and secondary outcomes. Subgroup analysis found that the addition of ΔSBP improved model fit for those with penetrating mechanism of injury and those with Injury Severity Score of ≥9, but not for those with blunt moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. Conclusion: SBP2 offers additional prognostic value in predicting trauma outcomes. Incorporating subsequent hemodynamic data during resuscitation beyond the initial SBP in trauma databases should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.