Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40290350›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2025

The impact of new population policies on women's reproductive health pattern in Ardabil, Iran: a comparative cross-sectional study.

Nazila Nejhaddadgar, Afrouz Mardi, Maryam Zare

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nazila NejhaddadgarPublic Health Department, Health Faculty, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
Afrouz MardiPublic Health Department, Health Faculty, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
Maryam ZareSchool of Medical Sciences, Khalkhal Faculty of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Family planning helps couples make voluntary, informed, and responsible decisions about having children based on their economic, physical, and psychological capabilities. New population policies have banned family planning services in Iran. This study sought to investigate the impact of these policies on women's reproductive health pattern in Ardabil, Iran. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted on 800 eligible women (in two groups of 400, pre/post new policies) attending health centers in Ardabil. Health centers were chosen using a stratified cluster method, and the eligible women were selected through convenience sampling. A researcher-designed questionnaire was used to collect data on demographic characteristics, reproductive health history, and contraceptive use in the past six months. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 24, with Z and Chi2 statistical tests. Results: The majority of women were aged 15-24 (45.25% and 53%), had education levels below a diploma (52.5% and 47%), and were housewives (88.5% and 84.75%). Prior to the policy change, 67.25% of women used modern contraception methods, compared to 31% after. Rates of unwanted pregnancies increased from 28.5% to 49.25%, and the incidence of one abortion rose from 14.25% to 21.75%. These differences were statistically significant ( Conclusion: The ban on family planning services has led to a shift towards traditional contraception methods, an increase in unwanted pregnancies, and unsafe abortions. This highlights the need for health policymakers to implement appropriate interventions.

Indexed as

ArdabilIrannew population policiesreproductive healthwomen

Identifiers

PMID40290350
PMCPMC12021829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.