Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40290346›Full record

ArticleMedical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention2024

An approach to building foundation models for brain image analysis.

Davood Karimi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Davood KarimiComputational Radiology Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Enabling the Assessment of Fetal Brain Development and Degeneration with Machine LearningR01NS128281 · NINDS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Davood Karimi · 2023 to 2026
$1.8M
Accurate, reliable, and interpretable machine learning for assessment of neonatal and pediatric brain micro-structureR01HD110772 · NICHD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Davood Karimi · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD110772NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS128281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing machine learning methods for brain image analysis are mostly based on supervised training. They require large labeled datasets, which can be costly or impossible to obtain. Moreover, the trained models are useful only for the narrow task defined by the labels. In this work, we developed a new method, based on the concept of foundation models, to overcome these limitations. Our model is an attention-based neural network that is trained using a novel self-supervised approach. Specifically, the model is trained to generate brain images in a patch-wise manner, thereby learning the brain structure. To facilitate learning of image details, we propose a new method that encodes high-frequency information using convolutional kernels with random weights. We trained our model on a pool of 10 public datasets. We then applied the model on five independent datasets to perform segmentation, lesion detection, denoising, and brain age estimation. Results showed that the foundation model achieved competitive or better results on all tasks, while significantly reducing the required amount of labeled training data. Our method enables leveraging large unlabeled neuroimaging datasets to effectively address diverse brain image analysis tasks and reduce the time and cost requirements of acquiring labels.

Indexed as

braindeep learningfoundation modelsneuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID40290346
PMCPMC12033034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.