ArticleMedical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention2024
An approach to building foundation models for brain image analysis.
Article in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning Empowered Microstructure Codebook: New Paradigm for Multi-Parameter Tissue Characterization Estimation.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Nonlinear KCCA in fMRI activation analysis: Self-supervised optimization and robust back-reconstruction.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Existing machine learning methods for brain image analysis are mostly based on supervised training. They require large labeled datasets, which can be costly or impossible to obtain. Moreover, the trained models are useful only for the narrow task defined by the labels. In this work, we developed a new method, based on the concept of foundation models, to overcome these limitations. Our model is an attention-based neural network that is trained using a novel self-supervised approach. Specifically, the model is trained to generate brain images in a patch-wise manner, thereby learning the brain structure. To facilitate learning of image details, we propose a new method that encodes high-frequency information using convolutional kernels with random weights. We trained our model on a pool of 10 public datasets. We then applied the model on five independent datasets to perform segmentation, lesion detection, denoising, and brain age estimation. Results showed that the foundation model achieved competitive or better results on all tasks, while significantly reducing the required amount of labeled training data. Our method enables leveraging large unlabeled neuroimaging datasets to effectively address diverse brain image analysis tasks and reduce the time and cost requirements of acquiring labels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.