ArticleDigital health
Sociodemographic and health predictors of adherence to self-administered computerized cognitive assessment.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cognitive assessment is essential to detect early cognitive decline and guide interventions. Self-administered computerized assessment is a promising option for periodic cognitive screening in the general population. One of the most critical challenges to implementing cognitive screening in at risk populations is participants' adherence. However, there is insufficient evidence to determine which factors are essential for adherence to long-term digital cognitive screening. Aims: This study aims to investigate potential sociodemographic and health predictors of adherence to a self-administered web-based cognitive monitoring, the Brain on Track (BoT), in the general population. Methods: Participants ( Results: Being older positively affects adherence to periodic cognitive screening for both follow-up periods. Being a female, having more years of formal education, presenting more BoT baseline correct answers and fewer BoT baseline incorrect answers, and reporting memory complaints positively affect adherence to periodic screening at 3 to 6 years of follow-up but not at 1-year follow-up. Discussion: The identified determinants of adherence can be considered when planning long-term cognitive screening protocols to increase adherence. Specific strategies could be helpful to improve the adherence of participants who adhere less.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.