Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40290219›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025

Obstetrical outcome in pregnant women presenting with congenital uterine anomalies.

Shahida Sutan, Samina Alia Sabir, Nazia Liaqat, Qudsia Qazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shahida SutanShahida Sutan, FCPS Assistant Professor, Department of Gynae, Medical Teaching Hospital, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar Pakistan.
Samina Alia SabirSamina Alia Sabir, FCPS Assistant Professor, Department of Gynae, Medical Teaching Hospital, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar Pakistan.
Nazia LiaqatNazia Liaqat, FCPS Associate Professor, Department of Gynae, Medical Teaching Hospital, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar Pakistan.
Qudsia QaziQudsia Qazi, FCPS Associate Professor, Department of Gynae, Medical Teaching Hospital, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the obstetrical outcome in pregnant women who presented with congenital uterine anomalies. Methods: Sixty patients participated in this descriptive study conducted at department of obstetrics and gynecology, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar from February 2023 to April 2024. Pregnant patients with CUA aged 20 to 35 years and gestational age 30 to 42 with singleton pregnancy were included. Classification of CUA was assessed along with negative obstetric outcomes. Data analysis was done using SPSS 20. Results: Septate uterus was detected in 13 (21.7%), unicornuate 5 (8.3%), bicornuate 32 (53.3%), and didelphys 10 (16.7%). Cesarean section 40 (66.7%), preterm delivery 21 (35%), malpresentation 33 (55%), SGA 36 (43.3%), and low birth weight 18 (30%) were negative obstetric outcomes. Unicornuate uterus and bicornuate uterus had greater caesarean section rates. Patients with unicornuate uterus, didelphys and septate had more preterm deliveries. Fetus malpresentation was higher in bicornuate uterus than other CUAs. Septate uterine patients had higher SGA and low birth weight rates. Conclusion: Our investigation confirms unfavorable obstetric outcomes are commonly linked to congenital uterine abnormalities.

Indexed as

Congenital uterine abnormalitiesObstetric outcomesPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40290219
PMCPMC12022557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.