ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Macrophages and cardiac lesion in zebrafish: what can single-cell RNA sequencing reveal?
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Histological and Lectinhistochemical Pattern of the Inflammatory Response toAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Interferon signaling is required for early neutrophil recruitment after zebrafish heart injury.Biology open · 2026Article
- Lessons of Macrophage-Associated Heart Regeneration in Fish, Amphibians, and Neonatal Mice, Applied to Adult Mice: A Perspective on α-Gal Nanoparticles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Interferon signaling promotes early neutrophil recruitment after zebrafish heart injury.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of natural products bioactivity in cardiovascular diseases utilizing zebrafish models: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unlike mammals, zebrafish can regenerate their heart after cardiac insult. There are several ways to perform cardiac injury in zebrafish, but cryoinjury most closely resembles human myocardial infarction (MI). Studies demonstrated that macrophages are essential cells from the beginning to later stages of cardiac injury throughout the regenerative process in zebrafish. These cells have phenotypic plasticity; hence, overly sensitive techniques, such as single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq), are essential for uncovering the phenotype needed for zebrafish cardiac injury regeneration, from inflammatory profile initiation to scar resolution. This technique enables the RNA sequencing of individual cells, thus generating clusters of cells with similar gene expression and allowing the study of a particular cell population. Therefore, in this review, we focused on discussing data obtained by scRNAseq of macrophages in the context of cardiac injury. We found that from 1 to 7 days post-injury (dpi), macrophages are present with inflammatory and reparative functions in either cryoinjury or ventricular resection. At 14 dpi, there were differences between the injury models, especially in the expression profile of inflammatory cytokines, and studies with later time points are needed to understand the gene expression that enrolls the collagen scar resorption dynamic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.