ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2025
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in a male patient with haemophilia A: a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is characterized by the unexpected formation of an intramural haemorrhage within the wall of an epicardial coronary artery with or without an intimal tear, resulting in an acute coronary syndrome. Haemophilia A and B are inherited X-linked recessive bleeding disorders caused by the absence or dysfunction of clotting factors VIII (FVIII) or IX. Case summary: A 50-year-old male patient with a history of haemophilia A, type 2 diabetes and smoking presented to our facility with prolonged chest pain. His laboratory results revealed increased myocardial biomarkers and an elevated activated partial thromboplastin time despite the absence of previous bleeding tendencies or coagulation factor replacement therapy. Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction was suspected, and coronary angiography detected severe stenosis in the left circumflex artery. Intravascular ultrasound confirmed an intramural haematoma without an intimal tear, resulting in an SCAD diagnosis. The patient, with no bleeding complications, was conservatively treated with medications, including aspirin and bisoprolol. A coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) on day 3 revealed haematoma resolution, and the patient was discharged on day 11. CCTA at 8 months detected the disappearance of the previously seen intramural haematoma. Discussion: We revealed two important clinical issues: (i) SCAD in a male patient with haemophilia and (ii) the usefulness of CCTA in observing SCAD lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.