ReviewLancet regional health. Americas2025
Understanding the broader impacts of non-fatal firearm violence trauma in the United States: a scoping review.
Review in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mural Art and Youth Victimization of Firearm Violence: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2026Article
- The Peacemaker Fellowship and Urban Gun Violence in Richmond, California.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Cumulative and co-occurring strains among mass public shooting perpetrators: implications for violence prevention.Injury epidemiology · 2026Article
- Public health and criminal justice funding for firearm injury prevention research in the United States.Injury epidemiology · 2026Article
- Physical Health Challenges, Healthcare Needs, and Barriers to Care among Firearm Injury Survivors: A Mixed Methods Analysis.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2026Article
- What doesn't kill us, hurts us longer: a cross-sectional analysis of gun violence exposure and chronic pain in the United States.BMC public health · 2026Observational
- Preventing firearm-related deaths and the public good: a contingent valuation study in California.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Firearm rights restoration after prohibiting criminal convictions: a statewide descriptive study.Injury epidemiology · 2025Article
- Firearm Violence Prevention in Peril: A Call to Defend Our Public Safety Infrastructure.American journal of public health · 2025Article
- Community Firearm Violence and Dental Care Use in Middle Adulthood.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exposure to firearm violence produces ripples of impact that extend far beyond the physical wounds of direct survivors. This scoping review aimed to describe the breadth of the last 25 years of literature on short-term, long-term, and cumulative impacts of firearm violence in the United States across physical, psychological, social, and economic domains. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ProQuest Social Science Premium (ASSIA, NCJRS, and ERIC) and Web of Science until March 2024. Among 3172 articles, 87 met inclusion criteria. Our findings suggest that research most often explores short-term and psychological impacts on direct survivor-witnesses. The review highlights notable gaps, particularly regarding long-term and cumulative impacts among both the immediate social networks of survivor-witnesses and their wider communities. Further research is necessary for the effective development of trauma-informed interventions and the provision of economic resources aimed at supporting a growing population of survivors and communities affected by violence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.