Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40289663›Full record

ArticleClinical endoscopy2025

Fabrication and mechanical testing of polydioxanone hook cross biodegradable self-expandable enteric stent: impact of fabrication density and mechanical properties of the stent.

Tanyaporn Chantarojanasiri, Juthamas Ratanavaraporn, Saran Keeratihattayakorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tanyaporn ChantarojanasiriDepartment of Internal medicine, Rajavithi Hospital, College of Medicine Rangsit University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Juthamas RatanavarapornBiomedical Engineering Program, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Saran KeeratihattayakornBiomedical Engineering Program, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

Chulalongkorn University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe mechanical properties of biodegradable stent when fabricated using different number of pins per row of fabrication has been limited. We compared the radial compressive force of polydioxanone (PDO) stent that was fabricated in hook and cross manner, using 13, 17 and 19 pins per row and measure the radial compressive force and ex vivo deployment.

methodsThe PDO stents fabricated by the in-house aluminum mandrel were tested for radial force using plate compression until the stent achieved 50% strain. The relationship between compression force and %strain was calculated. Ex vivo testing of stent expansion against short segment stricture was performed in a pig small intestine compared between PDO hook cross PDO stent and braided metallic stent.

resultsThe stent shortening of 16.40%, 31.20% and 19.24% was observed in 13-, 17- and 19-pin-per-row, respectively. The maximum force to achieve 50% strain were 0.503, 1.168 and 1.008 N for 13, 17 and 19 pins per row, respectively. The stent fabricated using hook and cross pattern demonstrated higher conformability to anatomical stricture when compared with braided stent.

conclusionsPDO stent fabricated using 17 pins per row demonstrated highest radial force when compared with 13 and 19 pins per row.

Indexed as

BiodegradableEntericRadial forceSelf-expandableStents

Identifiers

PMID40289663
PMCPMC12314621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.