ArticleJournal of cellular biochemistry2025
RETRACTION: Downregulation of miR-122 in the Rodent and Human Hepatocellular Carcinomas.
Article in Journal of cellular biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
retractionH. Kutay, S. Bai, J. Datta, T. Motiwala, I. Pogribny, W. Frankel, S. T. Jacob, and K. Ghoshal, "Downregulation of miR-122 in the Rodent and Human Hepatocellular Carcinomas," Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 99, no. 3 (2006): 671-678. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.20982. The above article, published online on 30 June 2006, in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor-in-Chief, Christian Behl; and Wiley Periodicals LLC. An investigation of alleged research misconduct by The Ohio State University found evidence that false data was included in Figure 4 A by using the 5S RNA Northern blot data for human HCC (tumor (T) and Normal (N) cells) between this article and Figure 2 in another article by many of the same authors (Meng et al. 2007 [https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2007.05.022]). The investigation confirmed that the 5S RNA data in this article was flipped horizontally as compared to the T/N samples in Meng et al. 2007. An investigation by the publisher also confirmed the evidence of image duplication and manipulation. This retraction has been agreed to because the evidence of image duplication and manipulation compromises the integrity of the study and the conclusions presented in the article. The authors did not respond to the notice regarding the retraction.
Identifiers
40289648What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.