Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40289623›Full record

Trial reportCancer2025

Feasibility and acceptability of the Comprehensive Oncology Rehabilitation and Exercise (CORE) clinical workflow algorithm in patients with newly diagnosed stage I-III breast cancer who undergo surgery as first-line treatment.

Lea Haverbeck Simon, Carson Saviers-Steiger, Emily R Dunston, Patrick Galyean, Elisabeth R Kimball, Justine Mendez, Susan L Zickmund, Pamela A Hansen, Cornelia M Ulrich, Paul C LaStayo and 9 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02328677 recruitingnot on this map

ColoCare Transdisciplinary Research in Colorectal Cancer Prognosis

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2007 to 2030Enrolled5,000ConditionsColorectal Cancer
NCT04594473 nacompletednot on this map

The Feasibility and Acceptability of a Comprehensive Oncology Rehabilitation and Exercise (CORE) Program Among Breast Cancer Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2021 to 2023Enrolled72ConditionsBreast CancerArmsComprehensive Oncology Rehabilitation and Exercise (CORE) Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Lea Haverbeck SimonCancer Control and Population Sciences Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Carson Saviers-SteigerThe Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Emily R DunstonDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Patrick GalyeanDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Elisabeth R KimballDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Justine MendezDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Susan L ZickmundDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Pamela A HansenThe Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Cornelia M UlrichThe Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7641-059X
Paul C LaStayoDepartment of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
David SteinbergDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Christopher S NorenTherapy Services, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
A'Lisha FinchThe Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Leanne SeckingerTherapy Services, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Emma BraunDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Jonathan ChipmanCancer Control and Population Sciences Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Kirstyn E BrownsonThe Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Sonal OzaThe Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Adriana M ColettaCancer Control and Population Sciences Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2503-2792

Funding

CTSA UM1 Program at University of UtahUM1TR004409 · NCATS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI RACHEL HESS, Jennifer Juhl Majersik · 2023 to 2026
$21.9M
Creatine supplementation and resistance training to preserve muscle mass and attenuate cancer progression: A double-blind randomized controlled trialR01CA281759 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Neeraj Agarwal, Adriana Coletta · 2023 to 2026
$2.7M
5 for the Fight, a Qualtrics Inc.-sponsored nonprofit organizationNCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004409NCI NIH HHS R01 CA281759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis pilot, mixed-methods, randomized controlled trial determined the feasibility and acceptability of the Comprehensive Oncology Rehabilitation and Exercise (CORE) clinical workflow algorithm. CORE was designed to connect patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer to exercise and rehabilitation services from the time of diagnosis throughout cancer care.

methodsIn total, 72 patients with newly diagnosed, stage I-III breast cancer who required surgery as first-line treatment were randomized 2:1 to CORE or standard of care. CORE included a triaging tool of two questionnaires regarding self-reported exercise (the Godin Leisure Time physical activity questionnaire) and functional status (the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function questionnaire), which were administered at the check-in desk for routine breast surgical oncology clinic visits at the initial surgical consultation, postoperatively, and 24 weeks after surgery. Responses to questionnaires in the triaging tool triaged participants to one of three pathways within the algorithm: exercise service, rehabilitation service, or exercise self-management (not a service). Service pathways required referral by clinic staff. Feasibility was determined based on completing the triaging tool (≥66%) and referral completion (≥50%) at the initial surgical consultation visit. Acceptability was determined by four study participant focus groups and one clinic team focus group (≥50% positive response).

resultsNinety-three percent of participants in CORE (n = 40) completed the triaging tool. Among those triaged to a service pathway (n = 29), 62% completed their referral. Focus group feedback was primarily positive.

conclusionsThe CORE clinical workflow algorithm is feasible and acceptable among women who have newly diagnosed stage I-III breast cancer with plans for surgery as first-line treatment. CORE was also acceptable among clinic staff. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04594473.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsExercise TherapyAdultAgedAlgorithmsExerciseFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkflowbreast cancercancer rehabilitationclinical workflowexercise oncologyhealth services

Identifiers

PMID40289623
PMCPMC12035508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.