SynthesisObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2025
A systematic review of the relationship between portion size and indexes of adiposity in children.
Synthesis in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Effect of Portion Size Interventions on Energy Intake and Risk of Obesity in School-Aged Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review of the relationship between portion size and indexes of adiposity in children.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025Pooled it
- Association Between Food Portions During Complementary Feeding and Later Overweight Risk: Analysis From European Childhood Obesity Project.Pediatric obesity · 2026Trial
- A Multicomponent Family Treatment of Childhood Obesity Based on the Planetary Healthy Diet: A Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Trial
- Characterization of food portion size in children from 6 months to 8 years of age: a descriptive analysis.European journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- Understanding Parents' Experiences of Using a Portion Guide for Young Children: A Qualitative Study.Maternal & child nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research suggests that larger food portion sizes (PS) during a meal or snack increase daily energy intake in children. However, it remains unclear whether this 'PS effect' would lead to a sustained increase in consumption and affect body adiposity. This systematic review assesses the evidence for a relationship between served, consumed, and preferred PS (food or drink size in grams or kcal) and indexes of adiposity (e.g., BMI percentile, BMI z-scores) in children (< 19 years). A total of 17 articles were identified using six electronic databases (PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global). Articles were screened independently by 2 researchers; 21 studies were included (15 cross-sectional, 2 experimental, 1 case study, 1 longitudinal, and two interventions). A narrative review was conducted due to high levels of heterogeneity. Cross-sectional and experimental studies (n = 13) reported positive associations between PS and adiposity, but results differed according to the sex/gender of the participants and food type. Interventions (n = 2) showed that portion size reduction may be effective in reducing child adiposity. Due to the limited evidence on the causality and direction of the effect, and over-reliance on cross-sectional studies, more evidence on the longer-term impact of PS on indexes of body adiposity is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.