Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40289522›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2025

WAND: Wavelet Analysis-Based Neural Decomposition of MRS Signals for Artifact Removal.

Julian P Merkofer, Dennis M J van de Sande, Sina Amirrajab, Kyung Min Nam, Ruud J G van Sloun, Alex A Bhogal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julian P MerkoferDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2924-5055
Dennis M J van de SandeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6112-1437
Sina AmirrajabDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Kyung Min NamHigh Field Research Group, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9185-3986
Ruud J G van SlounDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Alex A BhogalHigh Field Research Group, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3211-1760

Funding

NWO VIDI (VI.Vidi.223.085)Spectralligence (EUREKA IA Call, ITEA4 project 20209)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate quantification of metabolites in magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is challenged by low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), overlapping metabolites, and various artifacts. Particularly, unknown and unparameterized baseline effects obscure the quantification of low-concentration metabolites, limiting MRS reliability. This paper introduces wavelet analysis-based neural decomposition (WAND), a novel data-driven method designed to decompose MRS signals into their constituent components: metabolite-specific signals, baseline, and artifacts. WAND takes advantage of the enhanced separability of these components within the wavelet domain. The method employs a neural network, specifically a U-Net architecture, trained to predict masks for wavelet coefficients obtained through the continuous wavelet transform. These masks effectively isolate desired signal components in the wavelet domain, which are then inverse-transformed to obtain separated signals. Notably, an artifact mask is created by inverting the sum of all known signal masks, enabling WAND to capture and remove even unpredictable artifacts. The effectiveness of WAND in achieving accurate decomposition is demonstrated through numerical evaluations using simulated spectra. Furthermore, WAND's artifact removal capabilities significantly enhance the quantification accuracy of linear combination model fitting. The method's robustness is further validated using data from the 2016 MRS Fitting Challenge and in vivo experiments.

Indexed as

ArtifactsNeural Networks, ComputerWavelet AnalysisAlgorithmsHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyReproducibility of ResultsSignal-To-Noise Ratioartifact removaldeep learningmagnetic resonance spectroscopywavelet analysis

Identifiers

PMID40289522
PMCPMC12035526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.