ReviewThe New phytologist2025
Regeneration and defense: unveiling the molecular interplay in plants.
Review in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The genome of Thesium ramosoides (Santalales) reveals evolutionary dynamics associated with parasitism and alpine adaptation.Plant communications · 2026Article
- Puccinia triticina Effector Pt3863 Targets and Subverts TaRLCK176 to Suppress Wheat Resistance to Leaf Rust.Molecular plant pathology · 2026Article
- Histone deacetylases and cell-cycle regulators orchestrate cell-identity transitions during Arabidopsis root regeneration.Molecular plant · 2026Article
- Dedifferentiation of Plant Cells: A Term Covering Multiple Pathways?Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cytokinin-supplemented medium drivesFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Proline transporters balance the salicylic acid-mediated trade-off between regeneration and immunity in plants.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Unlocking plant regeneration capacity: small signaling peptides are on aboard.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In both plants and animals, tissue or organ regeneration typically follows wounding, which also activates defense responses against pathogenic microbes and herbivores. Both intrinsic and environmental cues guide the molecular decisions between regeneration and defense. In animal studies, extensive research has highlighted the role of various microbes - including pathogenic, commensal, and beneficial species - in influencing the signaling interplay between immunity and regeneration. Conversely, most plant regeneration studies are conducted under sterile conditions, which leaves a gap in our understanding of how plant innate immunity influences regeneration pathways. Recent findings have begun to elucidate the roles of key defense pathways in modulating plant regeneration and the crosstalk between these two processes. These studies also explore how microbes might influence the molecular choice between defense and regeneration in plants. This review examines the molecular mechanisms governing the balance between plant regeneration and innate immunity, with a focus on the emerging role of aging and microbial interactions in shaping these processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.