Observational studyInternational wound journal2025
A Clinical Audit of Surgical Site Infection Surveillance in a Maxillo-Facial and Oral Surgery Unit in an Academic Hospital Complex in South Africa.
Observational study in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Prevalence and Surveillance of Surgical Site Infections in South Africa: A Literature Review.International wound journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical outcomes and financial impact of surgical site infection within South Africa is not well known due to the lack of an established national surveillance programme. The aim of this project was to undertake a baseline clinical audit of surgical site infection prevention in a Maxillo-facial and Oral Surgery unit using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical guideline (NG125) as the benchmark standard. The primary objective was to establish a baseline incidence of surgical site infection. This was a prospective and observational clinical audit undertaken at the MFOS unit in a University Hospital in South Africa. Thirty-seven participants who had surgical procedures were recruited and monitored telephonically post-discharge for a period of 30 days. The composite compliance rate to the process indicators was 39.86% (95% Confidence Interval 37.25-42.46). The incidence rate of surgical site infection was 14.81% (n = 8). The resection of head and neck malignancy contributed majority of the SSI cases (50%, n = 4). Five organ/space SSI cases were detected with a mortality rate of 25% (n = 2). The higher surgical site infection rates may be associated with the lapses in the infection control practices. For example, the lack of an aseptic technique lack or structured approach to wound management. The main recommendation was the development of evidence-based surgical site infection preventative strategies that are applicable to the Maxillo-facial and Oral Surgery procedures to reduce surgical site infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.