Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40289425›Full record

ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2025

Controlled Magnesium Ion Delivery via Mg-Sputtered Nerve Conduit for Enhancing Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.

Hyewon Kim, Jieun Kwon, Hyeok Kim, Sunhee Lee, Seongchan Kim, Ji-Young Lee, Khandoker Asiqur Rahaman, Taeyeon Kim, Hyojin Lee, Myoung-Ryul Ok and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hyewon KimBiomaterials Research Center, Biomedical Research Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea.
Jieun KwonBiomaterials Research Center, Biomedical Research Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea.
Hyeok KimBiomaterials Research Center, Biomedical Research Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea.
Sunhee LeeBiomaterials Research Center, Biomedical Research Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea.
Seongchan KimCollege of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52828, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Young LeeBiomaterials Research Center, Biomedical Research Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea.
Khandoker Asiqur RahamanBiomaterials Research Center, Biomedical Research Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea.
Taeyeon KimBiomaterials Research Center, Biomedical Research Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea.
Hyojin LeeBiomaterials Research Center, Biomedical Research Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea.
Myoung-Ryul OkBiomaterials Research Center, Biomedical Research Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea.
Seok ChungDepartment of Biomicro System Technology, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Hyung-Seop HanBiomaterials Research Center, Biomedical Research Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6870-1485
Yu-Chan KimBiomaterials Research Center, Biomedical Research Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, 02792, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Korea Institute of Science and Technology 2E33151Korea Institute of Science and Technology 2E33781Korea Research Council RS-2022-NR068191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autologous nerve grafting remains the gold standard for treating peripheral nerve injuries; however, it is constrained by limited donor nerve availability, the need for secondary surgeries, and sensory loss at the donor site. Biodegradable material-based nerve conduits have emerged as a promising alternative to address these limitations and enhance nerve regeneration. Among these materials, magnesium stands out due to its exceptional biocompatibility, biofunctionality, and neuroprotective properties. Despite its potential, magnesium's rapid corrosion rate and the need for controlled ion release necessitate advanced modifications, such as the development of Mg alloys. However, these approaches often face challenges, including viability concerns and material hardness, which can hinder nerve repair and damage surrounding tissues. In this study, a novel solution is introduced by sputtering magnesium onto a soft collagen sheet, achieving controlled magnesium ion release while preserving the material's nerve-like softness. This Mg-sputtered collagen sheet demonstrates excellent biocompatibility and significantly improves axon regeneration, muscle reinnervation, and functional recovery in a sciatic nerve defect model. These findings highlight the potential of an innovative Mg-based biodegradable nerve conduit, offering transformative applications across various medical fields.

Indexed as

MagnesiumNerve RegenerationPeripheral Nerve InjuriesSciatic NerveAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCollagenIonsMiceRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyBiocompatible MaterialsCollagenIonsMagnesiumcontrolled degradationmagnesiumnerve conduitsperipheral nerve regeneration

Identifiers

PMID40289425
PMCPMC12333477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.