ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2025
Controlled Magnesium Ion Delivery via Mg-Sputtered Nerve Conduit for Enhancing Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.
Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart-responsive electrospun scaffolds (SRES) for neural repair: Recent advances and future prospects.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- From blueprint to build: Metal ions in peripheral nerve development and engineering regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Multifunctional Roles of Magnesium Ions in Modulating Bone Regeneration-Related Cells.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Magnesium and nerve injury: Mechanisms and applications.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Enhancing peripheral nerve regeneration with rehabilitation and biomaterial-driven drug delivery strategies.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2025Review
- Controlled Magnesium Ion Delivery via Mg-Sputtered Nerve Conduit for Enhancing Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- Metal-Based Regenerative Strategies for Peripheral Nerve Injuries: From Biodegradable Ion Source to Stable Conductive Implants.Biomaterials research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autologous nerve grafting remains the gold standard for treating peripheral nerve injuries; however, it is constrained by limited donor nerve availability, the need for secondary surgeries, and sensory loss at the donor site. Biodegradable material-based nerve conduits have emerged as a promising alternative to address these limitations and enhance nerve regeneration. Among these materials, magnesium stands out due to its exceptional biocompatibility, biofunctionality, and neuroprotective properties. Despite its potential, magnesium's rapid corrosion rate and the need for controlled ion release necessitate advanced modifications, such as the development of Mg alloys. However, these approaches often face challenges, including viability concerns and material hardness, which can hinder nerve repair and damage surrounding tissues. In this study, a novel solution is introduced by sputtering magnesium onto a soft collagen sheet, achieving controlled magnesium ion release while preserving the material's nerve-like softness. This Mg-sputtered collagen sheet demonstrates excellent biocompatibility and significantly improves axon regeneration, muscle reinnervation, and functional recovery in a sciatic nerve defect model. These findings highlight the potential of an innovative Mg-based biodegradable nerve conduit, offering transformative applications across various medical fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.