ArticleProteomics2025
A Non-Metaproteomics Researchers' View on Metaproteomics in Microbiome Research.
Article in Proteomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating multi-omics technologies to decipher microbiome functions.Nature communications · 2026Review
- The need for standardization and improved open (meta)data practices in metaproteomics.Microbiome · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metaproteomics, an emerging field among the omic techniques, holds great promise for unraveling the function of microbiomes in host health and our environment. Metaproteomics can also be a valuable addition to multiomics studies of the microbiome, complementing genome-resolved metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, and metabolomics. The potential advancements from metaproteomics and multiomics research touch a breadth of disciplines, including ecology, biochemistry, immunology, medical microbiology, cell physiology, and medicine, and could lead to both fundamental and applied discoveries. However, there are significant roadblocks to widespread adoption of metaproteomics among microbiome researchers. In this Viewpoint article, we highlight the pivotal role of metaproteomics in microbiome research by showcasing its advantages, exploring opportunities to overcome challenges, and paving the way for its broader adoption as a mainstream technique. We hope that the recommendations provided in this Viewpoint article will inspire new, beneficial collaborations between proteomics experts, algorithm and infrastructure developers, biochemists, cell biologists, and microbiologists, enabling the construction of a knowledge base of microbiome function that can have an immediate and direct impact on host health and the environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.