ArticleCancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers2025
The relationship between serum levels of GRP78, GRP94, calnexin, and calreticulin and prognosis in patients with lung cancer.
Article in Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mining of genes and pathways associated with endoplasmic reticulum stress in Brassica campestris via RNA-Seq.Plant cell reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundTo determine the serum levels of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperones, glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78), glucose-regulated protein 94 (GRP94), calnexin, and calreticulin in patients with lung cancer and in the control group and to evaluate the relationship between chaperone levels and clinical data and patient survival.MethodsGRP78, GRP94, calnexin and calreticulin were measured in serum by ELISA. The serum chaperone levels of patients with lung cancer and the control group were compared. The relationship between serum chaperone levels and clinical data and patient prognosis was evaluated. The median survival time was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the hazard ratio of ER chaperones considering prognostic factors.ResultsThe serum levels of all ER chaperones GRP78, GRP94, calnexin, and calreticulin were higher in patients with lung cancer than in the control group and correlated with each other. Serum calreticulin levels were not affected by demographic and clinical characteristics. Serum levels of GRP78, GRP94, and calnexin were not associated with survival. However, median survival ± SE (95%CI) was 16.00 ± 1.72 (12.62-19.38) months in patients with serum calreticulin levels of 250.52 ng/ml and above, while it was 8.00 ± 1.38 (5.29-10.71) months in patients with calreticulin levels below the cut-off value (log-rank = 6.919; p = 0.009). Calreticulin impacted survival, even after adjustment for sex, histologic subtype, stage, treatment, and response to chemotherapy, which impacted survival [HR (95%CI): 0.656 (0.433-0.995); p = 0.047].ConclusionCalreticulin is promising for delineating risk groups in lung cancer screening studies, guiding treatment and monitoring outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.