ArticleThe plant genome2025
Genomic selection of maize test-cross hybrids leveraged by marker sampling.
Article in The plant genome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing Minimally Lethal Sampling Methods for Genomics in the Eastern Oyster (Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Genomic selection of maize test-cross hybrids leveraged by marker sampling.The plant genome · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Maize (Zea mays L.) is a staple crop and the most cultivated cereal worldwide. The expansion of this crop was possible due to efforts in management and breeding. From the breeding standpoint, advances were achieved through field experimental design and analyses, establishing heterotic patterns, and releasing heterotic hybrids. Over the last decade, data analyses have benefited from the surge of genome-based approaches. However, it lacks optimization regarding marker dimensionality, proper selection of tested lines and/or environments, and an indication of promising inbred lines for crosses. This study aimed to convert a high-density single nucleotide polymorphism marker dataset into a low-density dataset and perform genomic selection of maize hybrids tested in drought stress and well-watered environments for grain yield and secondary traits. Single nucleotide polymorphism markers were ranked and selected based on effects from a genome-wide association study. For genomic selection, methods containing general and specific combining abilities (GCA and SCA, respectively) and interaction effects were compared in cross-validation schemes. Accuracies using selected markers were similar to complete marker dataset for all traits under drought nand well-watered conditions. For genomic selection, the model containing the main effects of GCA for inbred lines and testers, SCA for hybrids, and the interaction of GCA and SCA with environments (Model 7) performed better for all traits when information about all environments was included. The model without interaction effects (Model 6) performed better when information about environments was missing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.