ArticleJournal of dental education2026
Interactive E-Learning Module: Enhancing Panoramic Radiograph Interpretation Skills of Dental Students.
Article in Journal of dental education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of an e-learning platform in improving dentists' CBCT diagnostic skills: a pilot study.Oral radiology · 2026Article
- Interactive E-Learning Module: Enhancing Panoramic Radiograph Interpretation Skills of Dental Students.Journal of dental education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTwo interactive e-learning modules were developed, focusing on dental panoramic radiograph (DPR) interpretation and a virtual dental clinic (VDC) for communication skills. The aim of the study was twofold: to quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of the modules in enhancing students' skills in interpreting DPRs and complying with reporting standards in clinical practice, and to qualitatively assess students' perceptions of the module's effectiveness.
methodsA mixed-methods cohort study was conducted over four weeks and included forty-five dental students in their final year. Students were assessed using objective structured radiographic interpretation and objective structured clinical examination assessments before (baseline) and after the e-learning modules. Student perceptions of the modules were evaluated quantitatively using an online questionnaire and qualitatively in focus group discussions. Quantitative data were analyzed using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Qualitative data from focus group discussions were analyzed using thematic analysis.
resultsAfter the modules, students' DPR interpretation skills improved for reporting radiographic findings (all p < 0.01), anatomical landmark identification (all p < 0.05), and pathology detection (all p < 0.05). Communication skills improved for reduced jargon usage (p < 0.01). Compliance with DPR reporting increased from 63.3% before to 81.3% after the module (p = 0.03). Students indicated positive perceptions of the modules, highlighted their flexibility, and provided reinforcement.
conclusionThe e-learning modules with DPR and VDC significantly enhanced student skills in DPR interpretation and clinical communication. These findings support the integration of e-learning modules in dental curricula to improve diagnostic accuracy, knowledge retention, and communication skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.