Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40289243›Full record

SynthesisAnatomical science international2026

Clinical aspects and epidemiology of os peroneum: a meta-analysis.

Maciej Preinl, Aleksander Osiowski, Maksymilian Osiowski, Katarzyna Baran, Kacper Stolarz, Barbara Jasiewicz, Dominik Taterra

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Anatomical science international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maciej PreinlFaculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, św. Anny 12, 31-008, Krakow, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2800-0845
Aleksander OsiowskiFaculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, św. Anny 12, 31-008, Krakow, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4197-1115
Maksymilian OsiowskiFaculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, św. Anny 12, 31-008, Krakow, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7533-2691
Katarzyna BaranOrtho and Spine Research Group, Zakopane, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4953-6836
Kacper StolarzFaculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, św. Anny 12, 31-008, Krakow, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2648-5851
Barbara JasiewiczDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Balzera 15, 34-500, Zakopane, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7152-2012
Dominik TaterraOrtho and Spine Research Group, Zakopane, Poland. dominik.taterra@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5135-6750

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Os peroneum (OP) is one of the most common accessory bones in the human foot. The literature indicates that its prevalence varies significantly and ranges between 0.4 and 20.3%. In the clinical context, OP is the main factor responsible for the pain condition known as os peroneum syndrome, which usually manifests as pain in the lateral side of the foot. The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive synthesis of data regarding the prevalence of this ossicle. To find the pertinent articles, a thorough search of the major electronic bases was carried out. Data on imaging modality, sex distribution, prevalence, and geographic origin of OP were extracted. Throughout the study, the PRISMA guidelines were strictly followed. The AQUA tool was used to evaluate the reliability of the included studies. 26 studies (22,948 feet) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence estimate (PPE) of OP was found to be 6.6% (95% CI: 5.1-8.5) (95% PI: 0.02-0.22) of the analyzed feet. In the X-ray-based subgroup, the PPE of OP was 6.7% (95% CI: 5.1-8.7) and in the cadaveric dissection-based subgroup was 11.1% (95% CI: 5.1-22.4). The highest prevalence of OP was observed in North America (8.6% (95% CI: 5.9-12.3)), followed by Europe (6.0%, (95% CI: 3.8-9.4)) and Asia (5.9% (95% CI: 3.9-9.0)). Os peroneum is a very common accessory ossicle which occurs approximately every fifteen feet. The highest prevalence of OP was found in the North American population. The occurrence of pain in the lateral part of the foot should draw physicians attention into considering a potential presence of OP during the differential diagnosis.

Indexed as

Foot BonesHumansPrevalenceAccessory ossiclesAnatomyFoot and ankle anatomical variationOs peroneumOs peroneum syndrome

Identifiers

PMID40289243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.