SynthesisAnatomical science international2026
Clinical aspects and epidemiology of os peroneum: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Anatomical science international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence of the Os Supranaviculare: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Os peroneum (OP) is one of the most common accessory bones in the human foot. The literature indicates that its prevalence varies significantly and ranges between 0.4 and 20.3%. In the clinical context, OP is the main factor responsible for the pain condition known as os peroneum syndrome, which usually manifests as pain in the lateral side of the foot. The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive synthesis of data regarding the prevalence of this ossicle. To find the pertinent articles, a thorough search of the major electronic bases was carried out. Data on imaging modality, sex distribution, prevalence, and geographic origin of OP were extracted. Throughout the study, the PRISMA guidelines were strictly followed. The AQUA tool was used to evaluate the reliability of the included studies. 26 studies (22,948 feet) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence estimate (PPE) of OP was found to be 6.6% (95% CI: 5.1-8.5) (95% PI: 0.02-0.22) of the analyzed feet. In the X-ray-based subgroup, the PPE of OP was 6.7% (95% CI: 5.1-8.7) and in the cadaveric dissection-based subgroup was 11.1% (95% CI: 5.1-22.4). The highest prevalence of OP was observed in North America (8.6% (95% CI: 5.9-12.3)), followed by Europe (6.0%, (95% CI: 3.8-9.4)) and Asia (5.9% (95% CI: 3.9-9.0)). Os peroneum is a very common accessory ossicle which occurs approximately every fifteen feet. The highest prevalence of OP was found in the North American population. The occurrence of pain in the lateral part of the foot should draw physicians attention into considering a potential presence of OP during the differential diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40289243What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.