Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40289220›Full record

ReviewCommunications psychology2025

Using computational models of learning to advance cognitive behavioral therapy.

Isabel M Berwian, Peter Hitchock, Sashank Pisupati, Gila Schoen, Yael Niv

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The role of affective states in computational psychiatry.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isabel M BerwianPrinceton Neuroscience Institute & Psychology Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. iberwian@princeton.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4626-9016
Peter HitchockEmory University Psychology Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sashank PisupatiPrinceton Neuroscience Institute & Psychology Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Gila SchoenGeha Mental Health Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Yael NivPrinceton Neuroscience Institute & Psychology Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0259-8371

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many psychotherapy interventions have a large evidence base and can help a substantial number of people with symptoms of mental health conditions. However, we still have little understanding of why treatments work. Early advances in psychotherapy, such as the development of exposure therapy, built on theoretical and experimental evidence from Pavlovian and instrumental conditioning. More generally, all psychotherapy achieves change through learning. The past 25 years have seen substantial developments in computational models of learning, with increased computational precision and a focus on multiple learning mechanisms and their interaction. Now might be a good time to formalize psychotherapy interventions as computational models of learning to improve our understanding of mechanisms of change in psychotherapy. To advance research and help bring together a new joint field of theory-driven computational psychotherapy, we first review literature on cognitive behavioral therapy (exposure therapy and cognitive restructuring) and introduce computational models of reinforcement learning and representation learning. We then suggest a mapping of these learning algorithms on change processes presumably underlying the effects of exposure therapy and cognitive restructuring. Finally, we outline how the understanding of interventions through the lens of learning algorithms can inform intervention research.

Identifiers

PMID40289220
PMCPMC12034757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.