ReviewCommunications psychology2025
Using computational models of learning to advance cognitive behavioral therapy.
Review in Communications psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Repetitive negative thinking is associated with conflict-related neural activity that modulates evidence accumulation.Journal of mood and anxiety disorders · 2026Article
- ESMR: a process framework for calibration dynamics across psychosomatic and psychiatric phenomena.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Perceive-Assess-Dose-Safeguard: a safety-gated state-action grammar for psychotherapy micro-decisions in computational psychiatry.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- From diagnosis to dynamics: complex systems, transdiagnostics, and networks in forensic psychiatry.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Protocol for a randomized trial to predict the efficacy of cognitive and behavioral interventions for symptoms of depression.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying the distinct motivational influences of reward and punishment on cognitive control.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The role of affective states in computational psychiatry.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2025Review
- Self-utility distance as a computational approach to understanding self-concept clarity.Communications psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many psychotherapy interventions have a large evidence base and can help a substantial number of people with symptoms of mental health conditions. However, we still have little understanding of why treatments work. Early advances in psychotherapy, such as the development of exposure therapy, built on theoretical and experimental evidence from Pavlovian and instrumental conditioning. More generally, all psychotherapy achieves change through learning. The past 25 years have seen substantial developments in computational models of learning, with increased computational precision and a focus on multiple learning mechanisms and their interaction. Now might be a good time to formalize psychotherapy interventions as computational models of learning to improve our understanding of mechanisms of change in psychotherapy. To advance research and help bring together a new joint field of theory-driven computational psychotherapy, we first review literature on cognitive behavioral therapy (exposure therapy and cognitive restructuring) and introduce computational models of reinforcement learning and representation learning. We then suggest a mapping of these learning algorithms on change processes presumably underlying the effects of exposure therapy and cognitive restructuring. Finally, we outline how the understanding of interventions through the lens of learning algorithms can inform intervention research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.