Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40289217›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025

High-precision information retrieval for rapid clinical guideline updates.

Florian Borchert, Paul Wullenweber, Annika Oeser, Nina Kreuzberger, Torsten Karge, Thomas Langer, Nicole Skoetz, Lothar H Wieler, Matthieu-P Schapranow, Bert Arnrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Florian BorchertHasso Plattner Institute for Digital Engineering, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany. florian.borchert@hpi.de.
Paul WullenweberHasso Plattner Institute for Digital Engineering, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Annika OeserInstitute of Public Health, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Nina KreuzbergerInstitute of Public Health, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Torsten KargeClinical Guideline Services, Kiel, Germany.
Thomas LangerGerman Guideline Program in Oncology, German Cancer Society, Berlin, Germany.
Nicole SkoetzInstitute of Public Health, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Lothar H WielerHasso Plattner Institute for Digital Engineering, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Matthieu-P SchapranowHasso Plattner Institute for Digital Engineering, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Bert ArnrichHasso Plattner Institute for Digital Engineering, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01ZZ2314N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delays in translating new medical evidence into clinical practice hinder patient access to the best available treatments. Our data reveals an average delay of nine years from the initiation of human research to its adoption in clinical guidelines, with 1.7-3.0 years lost between trial publication and guideline updates. A substantial part of these delays stems from slow, manual processes in updating clinical guidelines, which rely on time-intensive evidence synthesis workflows. The Next Generation Evidence (NGE) system addresses this challenge by harnessing state-of-the-art biomedical Natural Language Processing (NLP) methods. This novel system integrates diverse evidence sources, such as clinical trial reports and digital guidelines, enabling automated, data-driven analyses of the time it takes for research findings to inform clinical practice. Moreover, the NGE system provides precision-focused literature search filters tailored specifically for guideline maintenance. In benchmarking against two German oncology guidelines, these filters demonstrate exceptional precision in identifying pivotal publications for guideline updates.

Identifiers

PMID40289217
PMCPMC12034796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.