Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40289212›Full record

ReviewMolecular psychiatry2025

Nutritional interventions to counteract the detrimental consequences of early-life stress.

Jorine Geertsema, Hannah G Juncker, Lars Wilmes, George L Burchell, Susanne R de Rooij, J B van Goudoever, Kenneth J O'Riordan, Gerard Clarke, John F Cryan, Aniko Korosi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jorine Geertsema *Brain Plasticity group, Centre for Neuroscience, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hannah G Juncker *Brain Plasticity group, Centre for Neuroscience, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lars WilmesAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
George L BurchellMedical Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6281-4179
Susanne R de RooijAmsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J B van GoudoeverAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kenneth J O'RiordanAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Gerard ClarkeAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9771-3979
John F CryanAPC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5887-2723
Aniko KorosiBrain Plasticity group, Centre for Neuroscience, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.korosi@uva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9701-3331

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to stress during sensitive developmental periods comes with long term consequences for neurobehavioral outcomes and increases vulnerability to psychopathology later in life. While we have advanced our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the programming effects of early-life stress (ES), these are not yet fully understood and often hard to target, making the development of effective interventions challenging. In recent years, we and others have suggested that nutrition might be instrumental in modulating and possibly combatting the ES-induced increased risk to psychopathologies and neurobehavioral impairments. Nutritional strategies are very promising as they might be relatively safe, cheap and easy to implement. Here, we set out to comprehensively review the existing literature on nutritional interventions aimed at counteracting the effects of ES on neurobehavioral outcomes in preclinical and clinical settings. We identified eighty six rodent and ten human studies investigating a nutritional intervention to ameliorate ES-induced impairments. The human evidence to date, is too few and heterogeneous in terms of interventions, thus not allowing hard conclusions, however the preclinical studies, despite their heterogeneity in terms of designs, interventions used, and outcomes measured, showed nutritional interventions to be promising in combatting ES-induced impairments. Furthermore, we discuss the possible mechanisms involved in the beneficial effects of nutrition on the brain after ES, including neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis regulation and the microbiome-gut-brain axis. Lastly, we highlight the critical gaps in our current knowledge and make recommendations for future research to move the field forward.

Indexed as

Stress, PsychologicalAdverse Childhood ExperiencesAnimalsBrainHumansHypothalamo-Hypophyseal SystemOxidative StressPituitary-Adrenal System

Identifiers

PMID40289212
PMCPMC12185351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.