Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40289203›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A surprise induced by a visual-haptic illusion in virtual reality can lead to motor improvement.

Mirko Job, Mattia Manoni, Lucia Grazia Sansone, Antonello Viceconti, Marco Testa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mirko JobDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus Universitario di Savona, via Magliotto 2, Savona, 17100, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0991-420X
Mattia ManoniDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus Universitario di Savona, via Magliotto 2, Savona, 17100, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4513-7150
Lucia Grazia SansoneDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus Universitario di Savona, via Magliotto 2, Savona, 17100, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4201-7762
Antonello VicecontiDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus Universitario di Savona, via Magliotto 2, Savona, 17100, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1480-4061
Marco TestaDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus Universitario di Savona, via Magliotto 2, Savona, 17100, Italy. marco.testa@unige.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8643-7200

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed the preliminary results of an experimental protocol evaluating the impact of positive expectations on fingertip-to-floor distance during forward bending. Thirty-six participants were assigned to three groups, each receiving a sham physical manipulation in Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR). The first group received a neutral statement about the manipulation's efficacy, while the second and third groups were told the manipulation would improve forward bending, emphasising its fictious positive effect to increase expectations for a beneficial motor improvement. Additionally, the third group also experienced a visual-haptic illusion, by lifting a tile in front of participants and raising the floor in the virtual scenario, creating the belief of reaching the floor thanks to the received manipulation. Fingertip-to-floor distance was measured at baseline, immediately after the manipulation (after-effect), and five minutes later (follow-up). Differences between baseline and after-effect/follow-up distances represented the gained distances. Only the third group, which experienced the combined effect of positive verbal statement reinforced by the visual-haptic illusion, showed a significant increase in gained distance during the after-effect and follow-up phases compared to the neutral statement group. These findings support the potential of this multifactorial intervention to promote motor improvement by enhancing positive expectations.

Indexed as

IllusionsVirtual RealityVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultBayesian brainComputer simulationContextual factorsMotor improvementPlacebo effectVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID40289203
PMCPMC12034800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.