ArticleInflammation and regeneration2025
NRP2
Article in Inflammation and regeneration, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond Potency: Emerging Determinants and Optimization Strategies Enhancing Therapeutic Efficacy of Adult Stem Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical application of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has garnered attention due to their remarkable capacity to differentiate into adipocytes, chondrocytes, and osteoblasts. However, the quality of MSC culture varies from batch to batch, which poses challenges in ensuring consistent cellular quality across batches. Consequently, it becomes imperative to identify specific markers that can distinguish superior and slightly inferior MSCs.
methodsHuman bone marrow-derived MSC clones were isolated and subjected to flow cytometry analysis to assess the expression of NRP2, VEGFR, and plexinA1. The osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation potentials were evaluated using Alizarin Red S and Oil Red O staining, respectively. Furthermore, the migration capacity was assessed through the scratch healing assay.
resultsNine out of twenty MSC clones significantly expressed NRP2. NRP2-expressing MSC clones (NRP2
conclusionIn contrast to NRP2
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.