Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40289170›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The evaluation model of engineering practice teaching with complex network analytic hierarchy process based on deep learning.

Xianlong Han, Xiaohui Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xianlong HanFaculty of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China.
Xiaohui ChenFaculty of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024, China. chenxh582@nenu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to effectively improve the quality evaluation system of engineering practice teaching in colleges and universities and enhance the efficiency of teaching management. A brand-new teaching evaluation model is constructed based on the Internet of Things (IoT) technology, combined with complex network analytic hierarchy process and deep learning method. Firstly, with the help of open online course data, Natural Language Processing (NLP) technology and Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) algorithm are used to extract discipline-related features from the course content, and the data of 500 students in 10 majors are simulated and generated. Then, the real university curriculum content, teaching resources, and virtual student data are organically integrated, and two deep learning algorithms, Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), are introduced. RNN is used to capture time series information, and CNN is used to extract spatial features. Through the hierarchical analysis of complex network, the relationship between different teaching elements is revealed and the hierarchical structure is constructed. Meanwhile, dynamic characteristics are introduced, and continuous model updating and adaptation are realized by randomly combining data to adapt to the changes of actual educational environment. After the course training, data indicators such as students' homework, projects and exams are comprehensively extracted, and the correlation analysis between students' performance and characteristics, time series analysis, feature fusion and weight analysis, model performance evaluation and prediction analysis are carried out. Through the correlation analysis between students' performance and characteristics, the important characteristics that affect learning results are excavated. Time series analysis reveals the changing trend of learning process and better grasps students' learning state. Feature fusion and weight analysis comprehensively consider multiple key features to quantify students' comprehensive performance under different parameter characteristics. Model performance evaluation and prediction analysis compare the prediction results of the model with the actual performance to evaluate the accuracy and stability of the model. The results show that there is a positive correlation between curriculum dependence and interdisciplinary impact index (r = 0.725). The performance of student 3 is relatively stable, with the highest score of 91, and the score of students 7 fluctuates the most, from the lowest 47.9 to the highest 50.2. CNN characteristic index and RNN characteristic index are between 0.18 and 0.78. The comprehensive accuracy of the model in predicting students' actual grades reaches 76-98%, and the prediction consistency varies from 76 to 98%. This study aims to help reveal the relationship between students' performance and teaching evaluation factors, deepen the understanding of the evaluation model of engineering practice teaching in colleges and universities, and provide valuable guidance for optimizing teaching.

Indexed as

Deep learningGenerative adversarial networkHierarchical analysis of complex networkInternet of thingsNatural language processingTeaching evaluation model

Identifiers

PMID40289170
PMCPMC12034814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.