ArticleScientific reports2025
Implementation of pooled testing to increase access to routine viral load monitoring for people living with HIV on antiretroviral therapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multiple Summary Knowledge-Based Disease Prevalence Estimation for Group Testing Data.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For the 30 million people living with HIV on antiretroviral therapy, routine viral load testing is recommended to monitor treatment effectiveness. However, only an estimated 77% of eligible people accessed viral load testing in 2022, due to barriers including the high costs of tests. Here we assessed implementation of pooled testing to increase viral load testing efficiency at a reference laboratory in Cameroon. Plasma specimens were tested in pools of three using the Abbott RealTime HIV-1 Viral Load assay. For pools with HIV-1 detected, each specimen was then tested and reported individually; for the negative pools, the pooled result was reported with no further testing. From July to December 2023, results for 12,396 specimens tested in pools were produced using 6,797 assays, or 0.55 assays per result, with 3.6% (449) reported as unsuppressed (> 1,000 copies/mL), enabling an additional 5,409 people (+ 80%) to have test results. When testing pools of three, the limit of detection per specimen increases from < 40 copies/mL to < 120 copies/mL, with only an estimated 0.01% of specimens with results of ≥ 1,001 copies/mL (unsuppressed) having results misclassified as suppressed. These results demonstrate that pooled testing can be an efficient and accurate approach to increase access to viral load monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.